Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources.
The environmentalist’s statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?
(A) The use of technology is the reason for the increasing encroachment of people on nature.
(E) Marine fish continue to be an endangered resource.
后面不是有解释咩? A. Although the environmentalist claims that technology causes people's greater encroachment on nature in this single instance, there is nothing in the argument to suggest that such encroachment caused by technology is a general trend. A的意思是 人类不断侵占自然的原因之一是用了科技.(翻译的不好..将就吧) OG的解释是说不能从鱼这一个例子中推广这个说法..
后面不是有解释咩? A. Although the environmentalist claims that technology causes people's greater encroachment on nature in this single instance, there is nothing in the argument to suggest that such encroachment caused by technology is a general trend. A的意思是 人类不断侵占自然的原因之一是用了科技.(翻译的不好..将就吧) OG的解释是说不能从鱼这一个例子中推广这个说法..
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-2-18 18:55:14
收藏
收藏
