考到文艺复兴妇女的是这篇文章吗？谢谢

1.        GWD-3-Q35 to Q37文艺复兴时期妇女独立人格的研究（以某WIDOW为例）

      Historians who study European

       women of the Renaissance try to mea-

       sure “independence,” “options,” and

Line       other indicators of the degree to which

  (5)      the expression of women’s individuality

was either permitted or suppressed.

Influenced by Western individualism,

these historians define a peculiar form

of personhood:  an innately bounded

 (10)      unit, autonomous and standing apart

from both nature and society.  An

anthropologist, however, would contend

that a person can be conceived in ways

other than as an “individual.”  In many

 (15)      societies a person’s identity is not

intrinsically unique and self-contained

but instead is defined within a complex

web of social relationships.
        人类学家的观点

      In her study of the fifteenth-century

 (20)      Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a

historian who specializes in European

women of the Renaissance attributes

individual intention and authorship of

       actions to her subject.  This historian

 (25)      assumes that Alessandra had goals

and interests different from those of her

sons, yet much of the historian’s own

research reveals that Alessandra

acted primarily as a champion of her

 (30)      sons’ interests, taking their goals as

her own.  Thus Alessandra conforms

more closely to the anthropologist’s

       notion that personal motivation is

embedded in a social context.  Indeed,

 (35)      one could argue that Alessandra did

       not distinguish her personhood from

that of her sons.  In Renaissance

Europe the boundaries of the con-

ceptual self were not always firm

 (40)      and closed and did not necessarily

coincide with the boundaries of

the bodily self.举例

特别套路

逻辑简图：

1P: An
        anthropologist, however
            person conceived other than individual. But instead complex…

2P: study of 15C, attributes to… historian assumes, yet…. Thus conforms more closely to anthropologist’s notion….. Indeed, one could argue……  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-3-Q35:

The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?

1. Alessandra was able to act more independently than most women of her time because she was a widow.

2. Alessandra was aware that her personal motivation was embedded in a social context.

3. Alessandra had goals and interests similar to those of many other widows in her society.

4. Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.

5. Alessandra was exceptional because she was able to effect changes in the social constraints placed upon women in her society.

In her study of the fifteenth-century
        Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a
        historian who specializes in European
        women of the Renaissance attributes
        individual intention and authorship of
        actions to her subject.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-3-Q36:

It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes which of the following about the study of Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42)?

1. Alessandra was atypical of her time and was therefore an inappropriate choice for the subject of the historian’s research.

2. In order to bolster her thesis, the historian adopted the anthropological perspective on personhood.

3. The historian argues that the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed in Renaissance Europe.

4. In her study, the historian reverts to a traditional approach that is out of step with the work of other historians of Renaissance Europe.

5. The interpretation of Alessandra’s actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian’s research.

This historian
        assumes that Alessandra had goals
        and interests different from those of her
        sons, yet much of the historian’s own
        research reveals that Alessandra
        acted primarily as a champion of her
        sons’ interests, taking their goals as
        her own. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-3-Q37:     

In the first paragraph, the author of the passage mentions a contention that would be made by an anthropologist most likely in order to

1. present a theory that will be undermined in the discussion of a historian’s study later in the passage

B.    offer a perspective on the concept of personhood that can usefully be applied to the study of women in Renaissance Europe

3. undermine the view that the individuality of European women of the Renaissance was largely suppressed

4. argue that anthropologists have applied the Western concept of individualism in their research

5. lay the groundwork for the conclusion that Alessandra’s is a unique case among European women of the Renaissance whose lives have been studied by historians

In many societies a person’s identity is not intrinsically unique and self-contained but instead is defined within a complex web of social relationships.

GMAT Test - Section 4: Verbal - 第07套 6 of 41

 Qestions 5 to 7  According to the passage, much of the research on Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) supports which of the following conclusions?

A.      Alessandra used her position as her sons’ sole guardian to further interests different from those of her sons.

B.       Alessandra unwillingly sacrificed her own interests in favor of those of her sons.

C.      Alessandra’s actions indicate that her motivations and intentions were those of an independent individual.

D.      Alessandra’s social context encouraged her to take independent action.

E.       Alessandra regarded her sons’ goals and interests as her own.