ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1124|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11th--123

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-1-14 11:46:00 | 只看该作者

OG11th--123

123.Codex Berinesis,a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman medical treatise,is undated but contains clues to when it was produced.Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist,but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists,which indicates some significant disruption.Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florentine in 1148,Codex Berinesis was probably produced in that year.

问:哪个选项假设:Codex Berinesis was  produced in 1148

不看选项,请问该题的前提和结论是什么?

有点简单,请高人点拨下,谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2009-1-14 21:24:00 | 只看该作者

premise:Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist,but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists,which indicates some significant disruption.

conclusion:Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florentine in 1148,Codex Berinesis was probably produced in that year.

reasoning: the author hypothesizes some significant disruption cause the fact"Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist,but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists". according to the letter of the fourth copyist, which indicates that a plague killed many people in 1148, the author take granted that this plague is actually "some significant disruption". This reasoning is unsounded unless other possible explanation for "some significant disruption" have been ruled out. Imagine that perhaps there are large numbers of plagues in that period and the fourth copyist just noted one of them.Hence, you can not make sure which plague contributes to the phenomenon in the argument.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-15 12:44:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢你的回答!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 11:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部