求教一道想不通的cr

 Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.

Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.

In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?

(A) accepts Concetta’s criterion and then adds evidence to Concetta’s case

(B) discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence

(C) rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim

(D) disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion

(E) attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument

c,可是我选D，我觉得她没Dispute呀，请教。。。。。。。

(A) accepts Concetta’s criterion and then adds evidence to Concetta’s case

(B) discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence

(C) rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim

(D) disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion

(E) attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument

c,可是我选D，我觉得她没Dispute呀，请教。。。。。。。

C正确,因为第2个人是通过批驳对方的evidence(criteria) 而得出的新的Claim,

D的意思是说直接批判结论然后给出事实支持另一个标准

逻辑的论证顺序不是字面的而是字面底下的思维过程