ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1284|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

跪求甚解

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-31 15:50:00 | 只看该作者

跪求甚解

       One state adds a 7 percent sales tax to the price of most products purchased within its jurisdiction. This tax, therefore, if viewed as tax on income, has the reverse effect of the federal income tax: the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.

The conclusion above would be properly drawn if which of the following were assumed as a premise?

(A) The amount of money citizens spend on products subject to the state tax tends to be equal across income levels.

(B) The federal income tax favors citizens with high incomes, whereas the state sales tax favors citizens with low incomes.

(C) Citizens with low annual incomes can afford to pay a relatively higher percentage of their incomes in state sales tax, since their federal income tax is relatively low.

(D) The lower a state’s sales tax, the more it will tend to redistribute income from the more affluent citizens to the rest of society.A

(E) Citizens who fail to earn federally taxable income are also exempt from the state sales tax.

我被这题彻底搞糊涂了!!!  谁能解释其中的关系啊???

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?

(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.

(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.

(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.

(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.C

(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.

谁能解释这题的逻辑关系???

The value of a product is determined by the ratio of its quality to its price. The higher the value of a product, the better will be its competitive position. Therefore, either increasing the quality or lowering the price of a given product will increase the likelihood that consumer will select that product rather than a competing one.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn above?

(A) It is possible to increase both the quality and the price of a product without changing its competitive position.

(B) For certain segments of the population of consumers, higher-priced brands of some product lines are preferred to the lower-priced brands.

(C) Competing products often try to appeal to different segments of the population of consumers.

(D) The competitive position of a product can be affected by such factors as advertising and brand loyalty.E

(E) Consumers’ perceptions of the quality of a product are based on the actual quality of the product.

这个题答案错了把???

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-11-3 09:25:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-11-6 10:01:00 | 只看该作者
没人帮忙?  难道题目真的很难吗?????
地板
发表于 2008-11-7 22:27:00 | 只看该作者
1 A  收入越高,税越高。既税率对收入是反作用的。结论就是收入高的人要付更多的钱去买东西,对各收入水平的人是平等的equal
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-18 14:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部