ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1178|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

(求助)大全5-5 无人问过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-28 13:57:00 | 只看该作者

(求助)大全5-5 无人问过


    

5.     When
limitations were in effect on nuclear-arms testing, people tended to save more of their money,
but when nuclear-arms testing increased, people tended to spend more of their
money. The perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe, therefore, decreases the willingness
of people to postpone consumption for the sake of saving money.


    

The argument above assumes that


    

(A) the
perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe has increased over the years


    

(B) most people
supported the development of nuclear arms


    

(C) people’s
perception of the threat of nuclear catastrophe depends on the amount of
nuclear-arms testing being done


    

(D) the
people who saved the most money when nuclear-arms testing was limited were the
ones who supported such limitations
C


    

(E) there are
more consumer goods available when nuclear-arms testing increases

答案是c  和the amount of
nuclear-arms testing being done有和关系``一看就感觉是out of scope  就排除了


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-29 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
d
板凳
发表于 2008-10-30 14:49:00 | 只看该作者
C.这道题讨论过。属于Assumption题当中的“桥梁型”。把核试验次数的多寡,跟人的消费习惯联系起来。然后突然结论说是核危机感导致消费意愿降低。显然缺少了“核试验次数”与“危机感”之间的联系。D衔接了这个gap
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 18:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部