GWD-3-9-->携隐修改标题（[求助]請問 GWD 3-9 3Q!）

請問 GWD 3-9  看不懂是付現的人小費多還是刷卡的人小費多

Q9:  B

Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a credit-card logo.  Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?

1. The effect noted in the studies is not limited to patrons who have credit cards.
   



2. Patrons who are under financial pressure from their credit-card obligations tend to tip less when presented with a restaurant bill on a tray with credit-card logo than when the tray has no logo.
   



3. In virtually all of the cases in the studies, the patrons who paid bills in cash did not possess credit cards.
   



4. In general, restaurant patrons who pay their bills in cash leave larger tips than do those who pay by credit card.
   



5. The percentage of restaurant bills paid with given brand of credit card increases when that credit card’s logo is displayed on the tray with which the bill is prepared.
   

当然是付现的人消费多咯

而B正好也就是把原文的这个事实给重复了一遍，举了个例子作为说明吧。

逻辑关系是看到logo就想到自己的credit card.

原文讲的是大多数人 - 想到卡就觉得自己有钱，所以就多给小费。

答案讲的是一个特例 - 想到卡就想起自己一屁股债，所以就少给小费。

That is the feeling of spending power cause more tips charged by customer.

In B ,that is the feeling of debt or unhealth spending power makes the less tips.

Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a credit-card logo.

研究表明在饭店里面结账的时候,用现金买单的客户比用信用卡给的小费要多.

Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available. 消费者心理学家假设这一现象可以解释为信用卡拥有者看见了信用卡的标志,使他们认为自己的消费能力比他们当时所能够付的现金要大, 所以愿意多消费.

仅从题干上就发现前后两句的逻辑关系不一致,有discrepency. 题目居然问得不是怎样解释这个discrepency, 而是加强心理学家的结论。然后从B里面有多出来一个with or without logo 的问题。虽然说仔细看完题目以后的确承认B是最好的选项，但是出这道题目的人不是个白痴就是根本不怀好意。如果要出加强，那第一句话根本就是废话，甚至是扰乱思维的错句，与下文的逻辑关系是反的。干扰可以出现在选项中，但是第一句话就这样干扰算什么意思，绝对逻辑不严密。鄙视之！

Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available. 消费者心理学家假设这一现象可以解释为信用卡拥有者看见了信用卡的标志,使他们认为自己的消费能力比他们当时所能够付的现金要大, 所以愿意多消费.

仅从题干上就发现前后两句的逻辑关系不一致,有discrepency. 题目居然问得不是怎样解释这个discrepency, 而是加强心理学家的结论。然后从B里面有多出来一个with or without logo 的问题。虽然说仔细看完题目以后的确承认B是最好的选项，但是出这道题目的人不是个白痴就是根本不怀好意。如果要出加强，那第一句话根本就是废话，甚至是扰乱思维的错句，与下文的逻辑关系是反的。干扰可以出现在选项中，但是第一句话就这样干扰算什么意思，绝对逻辑不严密。鄙视之！