ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1579|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-93

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-29 22:45:00 | 只看该作者

OG11-93

93. A new law gives ownership of patents-documents providing exclusive right to make and sell an invention-to universities, not the government, when those patents result from government-sponsored university research. Administrators at Logos University plan to sell any patents they acquire to corporations in order to fund programs to improve undergraduate teaching.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the viability of the college administrators' plan described above?

(A) Profit-making corporations interested in developing products based on patents held by universities are likely to try to serve as exclusive sponsors of ongoing university research projects.
(B) Corporate sponsors of reseach in university facilities are entitled to tax credits under new federal tax-code guidelines.
(C) Teseatch scientists at Logos University have few or no teaching responsibilities and participate little if at all in the undergraduate programs in their field.
(D) Government-sponsored research conducted at Logos University for the most part duplicates research already completed by several profit-making corporations.
(E)Logos University is unlikely to attract corporate sponsorship of its scientific research.

答案是D, 但是本人觉得A 也正确,因为文中提到,法律仅仅授予那些“政府支柱”的专利权有 right to sell, 而A 说,企业希望成为exclusive sponsor,那就是说当企业希望找寻这个有专利的university 时,他们希望成为这个university的唯一sponsor, 但是有买卖 专利权的university 往往是goverment sponsor 的,所以也weaken了

请指教,有可能是我没有理解出题思路

沙发
发表于 2008-9-30 00:37:00 | 只看该作者
楼主想得太多了...完全一看D就是直接反驳,D说大学自主研发的专利早就被别的公司占有了,也就显然不会帮助大学make profit,这样就直接反驳了。然而A说企业try to serve as exclusive sponsors of ongoing university research projects和利益无关,或者甚至可以说是帮助大学赚了钱,必然不是weaken的啊,而且大学得不得的到profit和谁是sponsor真的不挂钩
板凳
发表于 2008-9-30 01:01:00 | 只看该作者
A可以看成"無關"
原文的重點是:
Logos University想sell patent給corporation=>fund programs=>improve undergraduate teaching
weaken的想法:
- (幾乎)沒人會買
A可以是"無關", 因為原文的重點是說Logos University想sell patent給corporate; 拿到sponsorship跟能不能賣來fund programs沒有關. 再加上, corporate-sponsored的research的patent能不能sell, 文章中沒提過...

一般來說最直接攻擊原文推理的就是對的choice.

LZ想得太complicated...
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-2 12:41:00 | 只看该作者

disaka and AlienX,真是太多谢了,原来我想得太多了

“一般來說最直接攻擊原文推理的就是對的choice.”这句话实在是太对了!!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-7 16:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部