og11-98新问

98. As rainfall began to decrease in the Southwest t the middle of the twelfth century, most of monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans whose access to water was less limited.

(A) whose access to water was less limited

(B) where there was access to water that was less limited

(C) where they had less limited water access

(D) with less limitations on water access

(E) having less limitations to water access

答案是A

对C  og的解释有点疑问：

C They is ambiguous and might refer to either the Anasazi or other clans, less limited water access is awkward

they为什么能指代other clans

记得以前的NN说过同一个代词在同一句话里面是指代同一个东西，题目中已经有一个their明显是指代Anasazi，they也应该是指代它的啊？

C They is ambiguous and might refer to either the Anasazi or other clans, less limited water access is awkward

they为什么能指代other clans

记得以前的NN说过同一个代词在同一句话里面是指代同一个东西，题目中已经有一个their明显是指代Anasazi，they也应该是指代它的啊？

我觉得：1.先行词where有问题

2.定语从句的代词指代应按照由近及远的顺序从主句中寻找:我觉得就是因为they本应指代other clans却误指代Anasazi，也可确定c错误

 但是我想问的问题还没有解决啊

NN说过同一个代词在同一句话里面是指代同一个东西。这句话证是ETS的要求。

但是显然这道题目不符合这个要求。你通过什么可以判断they同their指代是相同的词呢？所以造成了文章的歧义。

因为their指代Anasazi，所以they也指代Anasazi，因此they的指代没有歧义

把词典上的对access的解释贴上来，

由此可以看出access有opportunity的意思。我开始把它理解成了right，结果就把their access to water was less limited理解成了 ‘接触水的权利是更少受限制的’，从整个句子来看逻辑就不对了。

如果把access理解为opportunity, 那么句子就通了。‘接触水的机会更少地收到了限制(也就是有更多的机会接触水）’。

在粘贴一个搜索来的东西：We're talking about one billion people lacking access to fresh water, and many of those people are in countries where Coke has manufacturing facilities.  注意它的写法，access to water,而不是water access.