ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1113|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og130的一个新问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-10 09:19:00 | 只看该作者

og130的一个新问题

OG130

130. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled(裁定)
                that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

    

(A) that two upstate New York counties owed resti­tution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
    

(B) that two upstate New York counties owed resti­tution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
    

(C)
            two upstate New York counties to owe restitu­tion to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of

(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed
            restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians
            because they unlawfully seized

(E) on the restitution that two upstate New York
            counties owed to three tribes of Oneida
            Indians for the unlawful seizure of

    

og 解释说c的that 不能省略,想问下为什么?谢谢:)

沙发
发表于 2008-9-11 00:52:00 | 只看该作者
因为后面跟的是一个句子阿
板凳
发表于 2008-9-11 00:53:00 | 只看该作者
关于C, 没有RULE SB.TO DO STH的说法吧, 而且意思好像也扭曲了
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-11 08:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用iamwuyan在2008-9-11 0:53:00的发言:
关于C, 没有RULE SB.TO DO STH的说法吧, 而且意思好像也扭曲了

对啊,懂了,哈哈,谢谢谢谢:)

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-20 20:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部