28-19: Plankton generally thrive in areas of the ocean with sufficient concentrations of certain nitrogen compounds near the surface where plankton live. Nevertheless, some areas, though rich in these nitrogen compounds, have few plankton. These areas have particularly low concentrations of iron, and oceanographers hypothesize that this shortage of iron prevents plankton from thriving. However, an experimental release of iron compounds into one such area failed to produce a thriving plankton population, even though local iron concentrations increased immediately.
Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly against concluding, on the basis of the information above, that the oceanographers’ hypothesis is false?
A: Not all of the nitrogen compounds that are sometimes found in relatively high concentrations in the oceans are nutrients for plankton.
B: Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having particularly low concentrations of iron.
C: The release of the iron compounds did not increase the supply of nitrogen compounds in the area.
D: A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the iron-rich water from the surface.
E: The iron compounds released into the area occur naturally in areas of the ocean where plankton thrive.
C
偶选了C,很多人选了D。
题目是要辩驳 oceanographers’ hypothesis 是错的,没根据的/
而oceanographers’ hypothesis 是shortage of iron prevents plankton from thriving。而结论有说an experimental release of iron compounds into one such area failed to produce a thriving plankton population, even though local iron concentrations increased immediately.,即有丰富的铁加了进去,但是并无增加P的量。
偶反而觉得D是加强,D说 few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the iron-rich water from the surface一些天后,海洋的某些物质取代了铁。那就是说铁就少了,缺铁了,而正好说明了结论P的量没有增加是因为铁少了,从而证明了oceanographers’ hypothesis 。
而C说了,增加铁的同时,nitrogen 是缺少的,那么说因为铁的减少导致P的量少就不得而知道。
而B只是说了Certain areas ,只是针对个别例子,就象作文AA那样,这样是不具有说服力的,是不是?/
大家快来讨论啊啊!!! |