ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1801|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问大全13-13,没懂。。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-15 01:02:00 | 只看该作者

问大全13-13,没懂。。

13.   One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.

(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.

(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.

(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.E

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.

沙发
发表于 2008-8-15 02:56:00 | 只看该作者

(E)?

My reason: BCD are easy to be eliminated. A is relevant because "already" can imply the negative opinion of focusing on the competitors.

E is in support of benchmarking the competitors since it limits the advantage to be taken within the "products of markets" which I guess means the same thing as "products market"

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-15 09:37:00 | 只看该作者
对,答案是E,可是我貌似没看懂问得问题:Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors 是什么意思?可否翻译一下。。。多谢阿
地板
发表于 2008-8-15 17:07:00 | 只看该作者

benchmarking是比对的意思,就是比着别人的进度来看自己应该怎么做。

问题意思是要找一个理由支持比对"非直接竞争者"的好处,较之于比对直接的对手公司。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 01:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部