ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1265|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-63 看了讨论还是不明白

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-9 04:12:00 | 只看该作者

OG-63 看了讨论还是不明白

对D的解释

本题focus on effective decision, not on the proportion of time  。这个没太明白,D也没有说到时间的比例阿?

OG 63

Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making, However, a recent study found that top manages used intuition significantly more that did most middle-or lower-level managers. This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective that careful, methodical reasoning.

A.
                Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions.

B.
                Top managers have ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning making decisions.

C.
                The decisions made by middle-and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning

D.
                Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions.

E.
                Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle-or lower-level managers


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-9 4:13:44编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-8-9 04:33:00 | 只看该作者
解释里这里的TIME应该是次数, 对应D选项中的MAJORITY, 是说在做决定时USE INTUITIVE REASONING次数的多少
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-9 09:29:00 | 只看该作者
明白了,汗阿~~~
地板
发表于 2008-8-9 09:41:00 | 只看该作者

说说我的理解:

因为top M比middle M用直觉用的多--》用直觉能比较有效地推理

gap:那就是说top M比较能够有效地推理。decision-making

d是无关,没有讲到逻辑链的东西,只是说他用直觉来做什么事,和有效推理根本联系不上,pass.~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 06:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部