ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1033|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

有2个语法题不是很理解 谢谢大家

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-2 12:37:00 | 只看该作者

有2个语法题不是很理解 谢谢大家

在准备过程中发现几道题目不是很理解,
                
发出来希望各位大牛指点:

So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.

 

  1. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,

  2. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that

  3. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that

  4. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,

  5. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that

 

 

这题答案是E  但是我觉得E里面少了个 AND 连接。
        
不知道各位大牛什么高见?

 

The Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR) spacecraft will orbit the asteroid Eros for a year, slowly moving closer to the surface of the object to make ever more precise measurements that scientists hope will enable them to understand how the solar system formed some four billion years ago.

 

  1. to make ever more precise measurements that scientists hope will enable them to

  2. to make ever more and more precise measurements, which scientists are hoping to enable them

  3. for making ever more precise measurements, and scientists hope that they will be able to

  4. with the purpose of making more precise measurements than ever, and which scientists hope will enable them to

  5. in order to make more precise measurements than it ever did, and scientists are hoping they will be able to

 答案是C
        
但是总觉得FOR MAKING 感觉不大对。于是选了A
        
虽然A中得 THEM 指代不清

 

沙发
发表于 2008-8-2 14:21:00 | 只看该作者

第一题用排除法的话选E,AND有了也许更好

第二题逻辑指代不清是CORRECTIVENESS的错误,一定要避免的,而FOR MAKING的话只是EFFECTIVENESS的错误

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-2 14:24:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢谢谢。  不过什么叫CORRECTIVENESS的错误 什么叫EFFECTIVENESS的错误啊。   不懂
地板
发表于 2008-8-2 15:17:00 | 只看该作者

楼上看来解释不清,我来说两句吧

第一题,前面两句so 倒装其实是并列的,简洁明了,加and多此一举,and是累赘

第二题,hope不及物动词,排除abd,没有be hoping 排除e

over


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-2 15:19:04编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-2 20:26:00 | 只看该作者

第一题: 并列也要加AND得啊  否则语法不对了啊

第二题: 做这种题一般在时间压力下马上就把FOR MAKING这种表达方式排除了  看来以后还是要小心陷阱

6#
发表于 2008-8-2 22:49:00 | 只看该作者

for doing 与 to do 都是表示目的的,在两者都对的情况下,用to do 更好,但并不表示for doing 就是不对的!

关于两个so是并列的关系本人也不明白,难道and 都是累赘了?

晕~~~!望指教!谢谢!

7#
发表于 2008-8-3 00:47:00 | 只看该作者

第二题的A选项中,scientist belive其实是插入语,正确的用法应该用逗号将其隔开;定从中的主语应该是that,them指代——从逻辑上指代scientists,但从语法上优先指代主语measurements,存在矛盾。

to make ever more precise measurements that, scientists hope, will enable them to

8#
发表于 2008-8-3 00:52:00 | 只看该作者
第一题中的“So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry”是 倒装的so that结构的前半部分,而后面紧跟的“so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform”是倒装的形容词独立主格结构“         (with) n + 形容词短语(adj+prep+n”,并非主句的一部分,所以不用and
9#
发表于 2008-8-3 14:23:00 | 只看该作者
支持A,原文的意思是more precise measurements 使得科学家可以understand how the solar system formed some four billion years ago,而C另起一句直接说科学家希望可以。。。。与measurements 的联系远没有A紧密。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-10 11:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部