ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1189|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全section 26-3-25一个干扰项为什么不对?请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-14 19:21:00 | 只看该作者

大全section 26-3-25一个干扰项为什么不对?请教

The end of an action is the intended outcome of the action and not a mere by-product of the action, and the end’s value is thus the only reason for the action. So while it is true that not every end’s value will justify any means, and even, perhaps, that there is no end whose value will justify every means, it is clear that nothing will justify a means except an end’s value.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

(A) The value of some ends may justify any means.

(B) One can always justify a given action by appeal to the value of its intended outcome.

(C) One can justify an action only by appeal to the value of its intended outcome.

(D) Only the value of the by-products of an action can justify that action.C

(E) Nothing can justify the intended outcome of an action except the value of that action’s actual outcomes.

为什么B不对呢?

沙发
发表于 2008-7-15 00:38:00 | 只看该作者
答案是不是C啊?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-15 18:48:00 | 只看该作者
对的
地板
发表于 2008-7-16 00:13:00 | 只看该作者

while it is true that not every end’s value will justify any means感觉关键是这句吧~~说不是所有的ends都能justify~,刚好与b相反~b是说总能通过ends来justify而且都能justify,暗含的意思即每一个ends都管用,不符

看c,c强调的是ends是justify的唯一途径,但并没说是一定管用~~好像……the end’s value is thus the only reason for the action就是这句的翻版~

个人理解~还请牛哥牛姐指教~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-14 16:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部