ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1407|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教 :OG-3,谢谢。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-9 15:20:00 | 只看该作者

求教 :OG-3,谢谢。

Passage 3
     Federal efforts to aid minority businesses began in the
1960’s when the Small Business Administration (SBA)
began making federally guaranteed loans and govern-
ment-sponsored management and technical assistance
(5) available to minority business enterprises. While this
program enabled many minority entrepreneurs to
form new businesses, the results were disappointing,
since managerial inexperience, unfavorable locations,
and capital shortages led to high failure rates. Even 15
(10) years after the program was implemented, minority      
  business receipts were not quite two percent of the national
  economy’s total receipts.
      Recently federal policymakers have adopted an
approach intended to accelerate development of the
(15) minority business sector by moving away from directly
aiding small minority enterprises and toward supporting
larger, growth-oriented minority firms through interme-
diary companies. In this approach, large corporations
participate in the development of successful and stable
(20) minority businesses by making use of government-
sponsored venture capital. The capital is used by a
participating company to establish a Minority Enterprise
Small Business Investment Company or MESBIC. The
MESBIC then provides capital and guidance to minority
(25) businesses that have potential to become future suppliers
or customers of the sponsoring company.
   MESBIC’s are the result of the belief that providing
established firms with easier access to relevant manage-
ment techniques and more job-specific experience, as
(30) well as substantial amounts of capital, gives those firms
a greater opportunity to develop sound business founda-
tions than does simply making general management
experience and small amounts of capital available.
Further, since potential markets for the minority busi-
(35) nesses already exist through the sponsoring companies,   
   the minority businesses face considerably less risk in
terms of location and market fluctuation. Following
early financial and operating problems, sponsoring
corporations began to capitalize MESBIC’s far above
(40) the legal minimum of $500,000 in order to generate
sufficient income and to sustain the quality of manage-
ment needed. MESBIC’c are now emerging as increas-
ingly important financing sources for minority enter-
prises.
(45)  Ironically, MESBIC staffs, which usually consist of
Hispanic and Black professionals, tend to approach
investments in minority firms more pragmatically than
do many MESBIC directors, who are usually senior
managers from sponsoring corporations. The latter
(50) often still think mainly in terms of the “social responsi-
bility approach” and thus seem to prefer deals that are
riskier and less attractive than normal investment criteria
   would warrant. Such differences in viewpoint have pro-
   duced uneasiness among many minority staff members,
(55) who feel that minority entrepreneurs and businesses
should be judged by established business considerations.
These staff members believe their point of view is closer
to the original philosophy of MESBIC’s and they are
concerned that, unless a more prudent course is fol-
lowed, MESBIC directors may revert to policies likely
to re-create the disappointing results of the original SBA
approach.




OG阅读16


C中the anticipated failure rate 和 the rate actally resulted 是什么意思阿?


C是不是这个意思:


预期的失败率对于接受的商家来说要大大的低于实际的失败率。


在文中的line 9 中的led to high failure rates 就能体现么?它只说了导致高的失败率,并没有提到过什么预期和实际的比率阿。


按照推理题的做法,这是不是算出现新概念了呢?



谢谢。


沙发
发表于 2005-8-9 20:54:00 | 只看该作者

high(或low)本身就是比较概念,只有两者相比才有此说法,因此C的含义是可以infer的,不能说是出现了新概念。

板凳
发表于 2005-8-9 23:02:00 | 只看该作者

c是从文中推断出来的。仔细看og的解释,搂主会发现文中说:the results were disappointing, since managerial inexperience, unfavorable locations,

and capital shortages led to high failure rates.那就是说high failure rate是失败的一个标志,可以推断预期的失败率没有这么高。


楼主的翻译没有错。但是这个问题的定位应该在line 7-9,从几个失败的举例中找到正确的答案。这道题强调推断,我个人的做法是看与文章有关的,16只有这个选项与第一段有关,所以选c.


个人意见,不正之处请各位指出。

地板
发表于 2005-8-10 10:05:00 | 只看该作者

同一楼上的观点,因为从文中可以得到,


实际发生的rate(the rate that resulted)是failure的;是disappointing的


所以,这个原文中提到的“高失败率(high failure rates)”是比“预期失败率”要高的


同样,也同意2楼的观点,此"高"非彼“高”也,预期lower实际,并不是由“high”推断出来的


个人观点

5#
发表于 2005-8-10 10:52:00 | 只看该作者
ding a!
6#
发表于 2006-6-10 11:08:00 | 只看该作者

Even 15
(10) years after the program was implemented, minority
business receipts were not quite two percent of the national
economy’s total receipts.

拙见:quite 能否表示the relatioship between ancipated failure rate and actual failure rate? 

7#
发表于 2006-6-12 15:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cw_chan在2006-6-10 11:08:00的发言:

Even 15
(10) years after the program was implemented, minority
business receipts were not quite two percent of the national
economy’s total receipts.

拙见:quite 能否表示the relatioship between ancipated failure rate and actual failure rate? 

不能吧

not quite= uncertainty


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-12 15:46:36编辑过]
8#
发表于 2006-6-13 21:37:00 | 只看该作者

Quite Adv. Merrian-Webster

1)Wholly, completely: not quite finished

2)to an extreme: quite sure

3)to a considerable extent: quite a few.

尽管在该program 实施15年后,少数族裔商业收入不到2%.

是否表示以期的确failure rate ?

不能自圆其说了.

Thank for XJLV128.

9#
发表于 2008-7-14 16:47:00 | 只看该作者

弱弱地请教一句,这篇文章的最后一个自然段对全文的作用是什么呢?

我的理解是这篇是新旧观点对照的经济类文章,第一段是旧的观点(方法),第二段是新的观点(方法),第三段是对新观点的好处的解释以及跟旧观点的比较,那么最后一段提到MESBIC的员工和director的看法对支持作者观点方面有什么作用吗?如果说要证明M更容易成功,那么第三段已经说了几个方面(例如greater opportunity, less risk之类的),而第四段中出现员工与director的difference points不是反而削弱作者的观点,证明M是否好用很难说么?

请指教。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-14 03:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部