Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves Line short-term. Companies’ hopes that (5) promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify. A price promotion entices only a brand’s (10) long-term or “loyal” customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced. They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of (15) their customary brands is temporar- ily available at a reduced price. A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually (20) no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have linger- ing aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to a brand’s reputation or erosion of (25) customer loyalty, as is often feared. So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would (30) be more of them. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as (35) reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to manage- ment, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line. Q5:The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by A the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions B the frequency with which price promotions occur C price promotions’ inability to attract new customers D price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales E the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions 答案是B,偶选的是E。
偶觉得答案不对。。。谁能解释一下"effect on the bottom line"? 也许是我对文章和题目的理解有问题? 那么, E错在哪里呢?我觉得B无法在原文找到定位。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-3 11:49:14编辑过] |