107. Because of the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable. If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true? (A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market. (B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years. (C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy. (D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years. (E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
以下是引用echo_bsc在2004-2-13 16:05:00的发言： 我觉得这道题在考察原命题和逆否命题的关系。原文中的条件是 not go bankrupt-->10% increase-->20% increase, 所以，可以推出 not 20%--->go bankrup, E is correct
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
大家都不细心，原文中的条件是 not go bankrupt-->10% productivity increase-->20% increase, 所以，可以推出 not 20%--->go bankrup。10％与20％ increase 的东西是不一样的，20％ increase 估计是指收入或营业额之类的指标。E选项20％productivity increase is unattainable for Quore,指的是productivity,而且甚至没有了时间限制“of the next two years,”。所以，我认为E选项应改为“If a 20 percent （删去productivity） increase is unattainable for Quore in the next two years, then it must go bankrupt. ”才符合各位大虾的推理A->B,B->C,then A->C,so notC->notA.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-2-9 17:42:00
