ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1404|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈向东逻辑170页第29题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-28 00:27:00 | 只看该作者

陈向东逻辑170页第29题

Sentor:Jones is highly qualified for appointment as a judge, as evidenced by Jones's receiving a unanimous vote of "qualified" on the formal rating scale used by the Lawyers' Committee. That committe advises the Senate on judicial appointments.

Which of the following, if true, is the best reason for dismissing the senator's claim that Jones is highly qualified?

A. several members of the Lawyers' Committee are not themselves qualified for judicial appointments.

B. The Lawyers' Committee does not advise the Senate on all judicial appointments.

C. The Lawyers' Committee gives a unanimous vote of "qualified" only to those candidates for judicial appointments who meet the committee's stringent stringent standards for appropriate prior experience and ethical conduct.

D. The Lawyers' Committee gives a unanimous vote of either "highly qualified" or "very highly qualified" to 95 percent  of all candidates for judicial appointments.

E. Joes, like most lawyers, is a member of the professional organization that originally suggested the establishment of the Lawyers' Committee.

答案选择D。 我选择A。

谁能帮我解释一下这道题目?谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2008-6-28 20:41:00 | 只看该作者
A选项SEVERAL这个词说明的是几个,影响不了大局,所以不能选。而D选项有95%,说明绝大多数候选人不是highly qualified" 就是"very highly qualified,反正只要是个候选人基本上都QUALIFIED,所以以QUALIFIED作为标准不可行。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-29 21:37:00 | 只看该作者
Got it!thanks xuyidan!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 06:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部