黄皮书3-4-4（好久了LSAT版没人理）

发现之前只有一个帖子讨论了这个题，还没看明白，LSAT版太冷清了，回复发帖都没人理

4 It is more desirable to have some form of socialized medicine than s system of medical care relying on the private sector. Socialized medicine is more broadly accessible than is private-sector system. In addition, since countries with socialized medicine have a lower infant morality rate than do countries with a system relying entirely on the private sector, socialized medicine seems to be technologically superior.

Which one of the following best indicates a flaw in the argument about the technological superiority of socialized medicine?

(A) The lower infant mortality rate might be due to the systems allowing greater access to Medical care

(B) There is no necessary connection between the economic system of socialism and Technological achievement.

(C) Infant mortality is a reliable indicator of the quality of medical care for children.

(D) No list is presented of the countries whose infant mortality statistics are summarized under the two categories, “socialized” and “private-sector”.

(E) The argument presupposes the desirability of socialized medicine, which is what the Argument seeks to-establish.
答案是A

我明白A可以说明婴儿死亡率低的原因不一定是技术先进，但是不明白原文到底哪个是结论啊？看完原文，我认为社会医疗的技术更先进是结论，社会医疗的是否更可得，婴儿死亡率是否更低跟这个结论没有必然联系，所以就选了b，尽管觉得economic system of socialism也不太对，但是a选项没说明greater access跟技术先进没关系啊???

是不是又是我的阅读问题，原文的前两句压根跟后面的技术先进的结论没关系，所以不存在是原文的flaw的问题？

LSAT 逻辑题的思路与 GMAT 逻辑题感觉还是不大一样，LZ 不必太较真

非要分析的话，这道题应该是这样的：

总的CONCLUSION: sm 比 pm 更 desireble, 是因为两个consideration.

consideration 1: sm 比 pm 更 broadly accessible

consideration 2: sm 比 pm 更 technologically superior， 理由是  sm 的国家  infant morality rate 低

注意看问题，问的哪个选项是 weaken consideration 2 的, 那么在 consideration 2 中，argument 是:  infant morality rate 低 ---- >> sm 比 pm 更 technologically superior

答案 A ：他因削弱

前面的论述都与答题无关

明白了，是我没理解原文的结构和问题的关键所在，看来自己的阅读能力还亟待提高！！

谢谢喝咖啡的狼