ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1509|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-2-4-12

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-6 13:12:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-2-4-12

12.   Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.



Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctors second reason does not cancel out the first?



(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patients records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.



(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctors office staff.



(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.



(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.A



(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors patients took no advantage of this policy.



虽然看了以前的一些帖子,但有些答案的解释仍没给出,我还是比较晕,麻烦NN解答.



沙发
发表于 2004-4-6 14:23:00 | 只看该作者
A. 马上写病历的措施是病人不用后来再向医生索取病历.而且也没有反对索取病历耗时
板凳
发表于 2008-6-7 16:22:00 | 只看该作者

终于想明白了,就是说马上写病例的规定使得医护人员还是得去拿病例,不然医生脑又不是电脑能储存下所有的病例资料。不知道这么想对不对

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 02:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部