29考试 有个CR不懂 谢谢指点~~

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.  However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.  Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.  Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available

(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals

(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering

(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer

(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

答案是C我选D 我貌似“The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that”就没看懂 谢谢指点

这是prep上的一道逻辑吧

感觉是一到conclusion题 rather than weaken题.

尝试翻译题目:在基于某种事实的考虑下,结论在反对者的攻击下是不堪一击的.这种事实是:有理由相信______是可能的.

文中是在说profit的增加与high tables and stools增加的关系，D说点餐的价格问题，是sales的范畴，与profit无关。

我觉得D的问题是expensive并不能等同于Profit，故不能削弱