ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 15278|回复: 49
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问OG103

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-9 15:05:00 | 只看该作者

再问OG103

103. Students in the metropolitan school district lack math skills to such a large degree as to make it difficult to absorb them into a city economy becoming ever more dependent on information-based industries.



(A)  lack math skills to such a large degree as to make it difficult to absorb them into a city economy becoming


(B)   lack math skills to a large enough degree that they will be difficult to absorb into a city's economy that becomes



(C)   lack of math skills is so large as to be difficult to absorb them into a city's economy that becomes



(D)  are lacking so much in math skills as to be difficult to absorb into a city's economy becoming



(E)   are so lacking in math skills that it will be difficult to absorb them into a city economy becoming



In A, lack is modified by a wordy and awkward construction, to such a large degree as to make it difficult to. B is similarly flawed, and to a large enough degree that is unidiomatic. C is ungrammatical because it uses lack as a noun rather than as a verb: the phrase beginning Students... becomes a dangling element, and them refers illogically to skills rather than students. Additionally, A, B, and C fail to use one or both of the "-ing" forms are lacking and becoming; these forms are preferable to lack and becomes in describing progressive and ongoing conditions. D uses the "-ing" forms, but so much... as to be difficult to absorb is an awkward and unidiomatic verbal modifier. Choice E is best.




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-9 15:58:47编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-9 15:15:00 | 只看该作者

Students in the metropolitan school district are (so lacking in math skills that it will be difficult to absorb them into a city economy) becoming ever more dependent on information-based industries。

后面的becoming到底是分词呢还是进行时态,如果是进行时态,有人见过如此奇怪的句子吗?

板凳
发表于 2004-9-9 15:22:00 | 只看该作者
becoming 是现在分词做后置定语修饰city economy。
地板
发表于 2004-9-9 15:25:00 | 只看该作者
个人理解,becoming是分词,相当于that becomes,修饰economy,并且因为是一直持续发生的(包括现在),所以分词比从句更好。。。。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-9 15:34:00 | 只看该作者

那怎么去解释OG中的这句话A, B, and C fail to use one or both of the "-ing" forms are lacking and becoming; these forms are preferable to lack and becomes in describing progressive and ongoing conditions.原文A中后面明显用的是becoming。

6#
发表于 2004-9-9 15:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用leeon在2004-9-9 15:34:00的发言:

那怎么去解释OG中的这句话A, B, and C fail to use one or both of the "-ing" forms are lacking and becoming; these forms are preferable to lack and becomes in describing progressive and ongoing conditions.原文A中后面明显用的是becoming。



这句话是说,在使用lack/become这些词的时候,通常倾向于用分词形式,A中的Lack没有使用ing啊。。。。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-9 15:55:00 | 只看该作者
解释中说的是use one or both ,并不是说都要用ing,E中 lacking还是形容词呢!如果都要用的话,那岂不是要选D了!
8#
发表于 2004-9-9 15:56:00 | 只看该作者
我举的becoming是分词短语修饰economy的。
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-9 16:01:00 | 只看该作者
这题分词做定语修饰a city economy不难理解,OG中的那句解释关于A选项的令人费解?
10#
发表于 2004-9-9 16:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用leeon在2004-9-9 15:55:00的发言:
解释中说的是use one or both ,并不是说都要用ing,E中 lacking还是形容词呢!如果都要用的话,那岂不是要选D了!

D有明显错误,so much。。。as to be

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 00:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部