ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1031|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-29-Q37 怎么没有找到答案

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-4-16 06:18:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-29-Q37 怎么没有找到答案


    

Rabbits were introduced to Numa
            
Island
in the
nineteenth century.  Overgrazing by the
enormous population of rabbits now menaces the island’s agriculture.  The government proposes to reduce the
population by using a virus that has caused devastating epidemics in rabbit
populations elsewhere.  There is, however,
a chance that the virus will infect the bilby, an endangered native
marsupial.  The government’s plan,
therefore, may serve the interests of agriculture but will clearly increase the
threat to native wildlife.


    

 


    

Which of the following, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?


    

 


    
  1. There is
         less chance that the virus will infect domestic animals on Numa than that
         it will infect bilbies.
  2. There are
         no species of animals on the island that prey on the rabbits.
  3. Overgrazing
         by rabbits endangers many of the plants on which bilbies feed.
  4. The virus
         that the government proposes to use has been successfully used elsewhere
         to control populations of rabbits.
  5. There is
         no alternative means of reducing the rabbit population that would involve
         no threat to the bilby.


答案应该是C么?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 05:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部