ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1238|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep2 一道逻辑,几天未想明白,饭都吃不香了~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-10 23:39:00 | 只看该作者

prep2 一道逻辑,几天未想明白,饭都吃不香了~

Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

D Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza

就选D,这个题看好几天了就是看不懂,咋回事啊,NN能给我讲讲么?最好能翻译一下(不好意思的说~)

这是俺从Prep上手打的,看俺这么诚心求教,帮帮忙啊~

P.S, 为什么我在破解上面找不到这个题呢,这是我做Prep2软件上的啊?

沙发
发表于 2009-3-10 23:55:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-1-Q40:
   

出处:   http://bbs..org/dispbbs.asp?boardid=40&Id=124229

Until Now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated.  A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children.  However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

 Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.

  1. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.

  2. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.

  3. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.

  4. The nasal spray vaccine is not effective when administered to adults.
    短文的结论是小孩用滴鼻药对公众健康没什么太大的意义, 因为小孩得了感冒不会有并发症. 但如果成年人从小孩身上传染到了感冒怎么办呢? 他们还是会有并发症出现, 还是会影响公众健康. 从而否定了愿文的结论.

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-13 22:27:02编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-11 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

竟然在GWD上面,害我手打, 我整理了一下,可仍不明白啊~

1.       现在只有注射疫苗来防止流行感冒

2.       大人怕孩子疼,所以孩子很少有打疫苗的

3.       那些有危险得严重并发症的大人都会打疫苗 ??

4.       有一种新的疫苗,不痛,适合小孩

5.       然而,由于小孩很少因流行感冒而得严重的并发症

6.       所以这个新疫苗的普及对公共健康没有益处

问假设

D取非:大人得的感冒都是由小孩传染的
        
è
            
大人得并发症
        
è影响公共健康,
        
削弱

可是文章说那些有危险得严重并发症的大人都会打疫苗啊?不明白

我觉得要是假设的话也应该假设:只得感冒不产生并发症的话对公共健康没有影响

NN知道么?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-19 05:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部