lsat 3-11

Snazzy · 发表于 2003-12-19 08:46:00

“If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction,” said the biologist.
“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.
Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist’s claim but not with the politician’s claim?
(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct.
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct.
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives.
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives.
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.

Please do me a favour! thanks

snow_mountain · 发表于 2003-12-19 10:05:00

是不是D。

Snazzy · 发表于 2003-12-19 10:16:00

they said it's B, buddy, sorry for that

snow_mountain · 发表于 2003-12-19 12:19:00

呵呵，记得上次就错了，这次居然又错了。我真是屡教不改呀。看错了So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation 这句话的充分必要关系。这样看了是B了。因为 stop deforestation --》 save the koala. 直接和politician的话相背。

Snazzy · 发表于 2003-12-19 12:38:00

Yeah, u r right, it's against polititian's, but against the biologist's as well?

lsat 3-11

lsat 3-11

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块