ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1890|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]小安 20/63 第7题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-12-27 15:55:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
原文:
Species interdependence in nature confers many benefits onthe species involved, but it can also become a point of weaknesswhen one species involved in the relationship is affected by acatastrophe. Thus, flowering plant species dependent on insectpollination, as opposed to self-pollination or wind pollination, couldbe endangered when the population of insect-pollinators isdepleted by the use of pesticides.

In the forests of New Brunswick, for example, variouspesticides have been sprayed in the past 25 years in efforts tocontrol the spruce budworm, an economically significant pest.Scientists have now investigated the effects of the spraying ofMatacil, one of the anti-budworm agents that is least toxic toinsect-pollinators. They studied Matacil’s effects on insect mortalityin a wide variety of wild insect species and on plant fecundity,expressed as the percentage of the total flowers on an individualplant that actually developed fruit and bore seeds. They found thatthe most pronounced mortality after the spraying of Mataciloccurred among the smaller bees and one family of flies, insectsthat were all important pollinators of numerous species of plantsgrowing beneath the tree canopy of forests. The fecundity of plantsin one common indigenous species, the red-osier dogwood, wassignificantly reduced in the sprayed areas as compared to that ofplants in control plots where Matacil was not sprayed. This speciesis highly dependent on the insect-pollinators most vulnerable toMatacil. The creeping dogwood, a species similar to the red-osierdogwood, but which is pollinated by large bees, such asbumblebees, showed no significant decline in fecundity. Sincelarge bees are not affected by the spraying of Matacil, these resultsadd weight to the argument that spraying where the pollinators aresensitive to the pesticide used decreases plant fecundity.

The question of whether the decrease in plant fecunditycaused by the spraying of pesticides actually causes a decline in theoverall population of flowering plant species still remainsunanswered. Plant species dependent solely on seeds for survivalor dispersal are obviously more vulnerable to any decrease in plantfecundity that occurs, whatever its cause. If, on the other hand,vegetative growth and dispersal (by means of shoots or runners)are available as alternative reproductive strategies for a species,then decreases in plant fecundity may be of little consequence. Thefecundity effects described here are likely to have the mostprofound impact on plant species with all four of the followingcharacteristics: a short life span, a narrow geographic range, anincapacity for vegetative propagation, and a dependence on asmall number of insect-pollinator species. Perhaps we should givespecial attention to the conservation of such plant species sincethey lack key factors in their defenses against the environmentaldisruption caused by pesticide use.
                                
                                                                        
7. Which of the following assumptions most probably underlies theauthor’s tentative recommendation in lines 45-48?(标黄处)
     (A) Human activities that result in environmental disruption should beabandoned.
     (B) The use of pesticides is likely to continue into the future.
      (C) It is economically beneficial to preserve endangered plant species.
      (D) Preventing the endangerment of a species is less costly than tryingto save an already endangered one.
       (E) Conservation efforts aimed at preserving a few well-chosen speciesare more cost-effective than are broader-based efforts to improvethe environment.
                                
不理解为什么OA是B,我选了A
求赐教!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-12-27 17:58:40 | 只看该作者
这是什么题?prep题吗?我现在拿来练习提高能力的gmat题只有gwd题
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-27 18:08:55 | 只看该作者
luyita 发表于 2013-12-27 17:58
这是什么题?prep题吗?我现在拿来练习提高能力的gmat题只有gwd题

阅读的大全 prep我已经做掉了,gwd留着模考
地板
发表于 2013-12-27 18:26:56 | 只看该作者
题目问下列那个假设是黄体字作者推荐的基础假设。然后就读黄体字,perhaps we should,判断出来这边作者表达了观点,有点像一个逻辑题,说我们应该给予这样植物特殊的关注因为它们缺少因素防御来自杀虫剂使用造成的环境干扰。看选项,人类活动(导致环境干扰的)应该被禁止,这感觉不是相关的假设,D,E都和论证没关系,比BC,(我感觉难比一点),但是C说是保护濒危植物的事,而作者说的是such plants的保护,such pants往前读一句,说植物有四个特征,但没提到是濒危的,这样C就是无关的,而且把B放到两个半句中间,语言逻辑上是合理的,B犯错的可能性比C要小,排除四个之后就选B了
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-27 18:39:58 | 只看该作者
luyita 发表于 2013-12-27 18:26
题目问下列那个假设是黄体字作者推荐的基础假设。然后就读黄体字,perhaps we should,判断出来这边作者表 ...

好典型的CR做法。

不过我知道我错在哪里了,我把underlie理解错了,看成了undermine。。。拼命找削弱。。。
6#
发表于 2015-5-20 20:41:57 | 只看该作者
求解!Perhaps we should givespecial attention to the conservation of such plant species sincethey lack key factors in their defenses against the environmentaldisruption caused by pesticide use.


感觉这句话的意思是说这些植物无法对抗由于杀虫剂引起的环境破坏,为什么还要选择B继续使用杀虫剂呢
7#
发表于 2015-10-26 10:41:01 | 只看该作者
nilegean 发表于 2015-5-20 20:41
求解!Perhaps we should givespecial attention to the conservation of such plant species sincethey la ...

问的是assumption。主体段落含义说focus on那四种。
为什么要focus on那四种呢?
这里有个assumption就是还会使用杀虫剂,如果杀虫剂都不使用了,为啥还要继续focus on 那四种类型的植物。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-27 00:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部