我在补充点内容吧.夏威夷TEMPLESV1 最新研究证明夏威夷社会政治的发展比预想快。口述历史讲述17世纪初有个大牛人P统一了夏威夷，但无法证明，因为相关证据无法用C14测定年代。科学家用了新方法，证明 大量用于分配产品的寺庙建于17世纪初，从而证明了口述历史中17世纪初的大变革。 V2 第一段：某个文明或者宗教有个庙，可能比传统学者完成的时间要早。但是又没有确实的理论来支持。 第二段：新的科技或者是证据（这一点大家认真读吧）利用同位素测试装饰这个塔的某个海生植物。测出其丰收的时间等等.(就是说明了这个塔修时间和原来想的不一样 )。由于这个台是当地多余（surplus)物品的聚集和交换地，有重要的作用。因此都出这社会文明结构（这个复合词不认识）may serve one generation. q1 原文的目的：选项实在看不出来．我混淆的选项是 Ａ新的证据证明这个文明结构reform非常短 还是Ｅnovelty技术描述了历史 q2 serve vone generation 的作用。我选：这个文明结构比原想的更uneven． q3 原文暗示了什么？其中Ｂ是 这个塔primarily是物品（无多余）的交换和集合地．我觉得不像．我选的是"这个水生植物被装饰到塔得时候还是活的，when harvest time." 选项如此，我也没太读懂 c、Temples in Hawaii - Maui. Oral history told by Hawaii locals states that King B united two tribes during ... Researchers think the social politics change of Hawaii happened in a single period of history.Recently, researchers are able to date the temple by U..230..(two elements of temple wall)... It proves that many temples were built using the same material during a short period of time. Temples were used as a center to control the production and collect surplus foods. Therefore, it confers what oral history said. 2007年4月RC机经多次出现夏威夷寺庙(Hawaii Temples)，通过google终于找到原文（我没看过原文，这是基于各前辈所写的机经内容而找的，对照之后觉得十分相似，请看过原文的前辈看看是否就是这东东）。内容如下： Proto-historic Hawaiian temples on the island of Maui may have mushroomed up within just 30 years, not 250 as previously supposed, scientists say. The findings could significantly alter researchers' understanding of the pace of precontact sociopolitical change in the Pacific. Hawaiian genealogies and oral histories hold that sometime around 1600 A.D. a ruler named Pi'ilani united two opposing chiefdoms on Maui into a peaceful kingdom, marking the emergence of a religious state on the island. Archaeologists had been unable to confirm that sequence of events, however, in part because of the limitations of carbon dating. In the new work, Patrick V. Kirch and Warren D. Sharp of the University of California and Berkeley used another kind of radiometric technique involving thorium-230, rather than carbon-14, to date bits of branch coral that were collected from living reefs and left as divine offerings at seven different temples during construction. Dates for these corals, which had been incorporated into walls and platform fill, all fell in a narrow range of 1565 to 1638 A.D., give or take a few years on either end. Moreover, dates on the samples that best reflect the time they were harvested from the sea--those from the coral branch tips--ranged from 1608 to 1638 A.D., an interval of just 30 years. These findings thus point to intensive temple-building during that time. Because temples served as centers for control of production and the collection of surplus goods, the team contends, it seems likely that the construction boom accompanied a profound shift in sociopolitical structure. Kirch and Sharp observe that the conquests described by local oral traditions coincide with these new dates, and would have more than doubled the size of the Maui polity to upwards of 2,360 square kilometers--the magnitude of expansion expected with the formation of an archaic state. "The temples provide tangible archaeological evidence of the speed with which a fundamental sociopolitical transition occurred in proto-historic Hawaii," the authors conclude. Indeed, they note, it may have happened in the span of a single generation of Hawaiians.
V3 一篇：夏威夷发展的测定 q1有两个选型比较混淆：一个说文章是用新的科学技术证实了一个地区的历史；另一个选项是说，文章证实了口述者的话，并让人们对于某个地区的了解更正确了。我选的后者，因为没有说明是新发明的科学技术。
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-12-16 23:54:00
楼主