ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1976|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教黄皮OG 38

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-8 14:59:00 | 只看该作者

请教黄皮OG 38

companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. according to records maintained by each company, the employees of company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of company P. therefore, employees of company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of company P.

which if the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

A ..   the employees of company P lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of company O

B ..   company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did company O

C ..   the employees of company P were sick more often than were the employees of company O

D ..   several employees of company O wach had more than one job-related accidents

E ..   the majority of job-related accidents ata company O involved a single machine.

答案选B 不懂B是怎么削弱题目的,请NN指教

沙发
发表于 2009-8-8 21:34:00 | 只看该作者
他说事故多了,就意味着人更有可能发生事故,B说认定事故时,P比O认定的种类多,就是说,不是说更有可能发生事故,而是P的认定标准比较严格。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-8 22:12:00 | 只看该作者

LS的意思可以理解P标准严格?   P认定成事故,而O就不认定成事故了?

地板
发表于 2009-8-8 22:46:00 | 只看该作者
这题有漏洞 感觉题目本身就有逻辑错误
5#
发表于 2009-8-9 00:07:00 | 只看该作者

跟2楼想说的一样

3楼理解正确的。

6#
发表于 2009-8-9 00:55:00 | 只看该作者
我想应该是这样吧。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 03:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部