ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1067|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助GWD20中一题,没有讨论过。。。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-25 21:59:00 | 只看该作者

求助GWD20中一题,没有讨论过。。。

Q27:

A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty.  The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory.  When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

 

A.      There is no systematic有规则的,彻底的 difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs.

B.       There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.

C.      Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.

D.      Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize
                
处于不利地位mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.

E.       There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily.

各位同学,E为什么不能选?为什么要选A?原文最后不是说了rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.这个不是策略吗?非常感谢!

沙发
发表于 2009-8-25 22:17:00 | 只看该作者
说更信赖rework job,前提就是两者并无本质上的区别,否则就不构成公平的基础,就不能回应原文的not because the mechanics。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-26 18:40:00 | 只看该作者
还是不明白啊。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 17:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部