请教两提答案的正确与否？

bettyofarim · 发表于 2003-12-9 23:48:00

5. In 1985 the city’s Fine Arts Museum sold 30,000 single-entry tickets. In 1986 the city’s Folk Arts and Interior Design museums opened, and these three museums together sold over 80,000 such tickets that year. These museums were worth the cost, since more than twice as many citizens are now enjoying the arts.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the author’s assertion that more than twice as many citizens are now enjoying the arts?
(A) Most visitors to one museum also visit the other two.
(B) The cost of building the museums will not be covered by revenues generated by the sale of museum tickets.
(C) As the two new museums become better known, even more citizens will visit them.
(D) The city’s Fine Arts Museum did not experience a decrease in single-entry tickets sold in 1986.
(E) Fewer museum entry tickets were sold in 1986 than the museum planners had hoped to sell.
答案是A？为什么呢？A应该是支持吧？我觉得应该是E？

12.

resident of the United States: I have received over 2,000 letters on this issue, and the vast majority of them support my current position. These letters prove that most of the people in the country agree with me.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the President’s conclusion?
(A) The issue is a very divisive one on which many people have strong opinions.
(B) Some members of Congress disagree with the President’s position.
(C) People who disagree with the President feel more strongly about the issue than do people who agree with him.
(D) People who agree with the President are more likely to write to him than are people who disagree with him.
(E) During the presidential campaign, the President stated a position on this issue that was somewhat different from his current position.
答案是D。为什么?Ｄ中没有说明是否赞成的比不赞成的人多啊。我觉得应该是E？E说明了issue 和current position 不同，所以应该是很好的断桥啊

sunhx · 发表于 2003-12-10 05:35:00

我感觉这两提的答案是对的.
大部分参观者3个博物馆都去了,说明是80,000人次,仍然大约30,000左右人.所以most seriously weaken the author's assertion--参观的人增加了两倍.
总统收到2000封信,大部分人是支持他,但D支持他的人比不支持他的人给他写信的多.说明不能从给他写信的人的支持比例来判定人们是否支持他.

qww · 发表于 2003-12-10 09:38:00

我也同意上面的答案第一题为A ，第二题为D。
因为：1。消弱the author’s assertion that more than twice as many citizens are now enjoying the arts。作者推断的理由为In 1985 the city’s Fine Arts Museum sold 30,000 single-entry tickets，其次为1986年三个艺术博物馆的个人票为80,000.如果说去艺术馆的人为个人去一次，则说明爱好的人多了，但如果如A 所述Most visitors to one museum also visit the other two，则推出爱好的人并没多只是有更多的机会参观，所以消弱。E明显不行属不关选项。应及时排除这样才能节约时间。
2.答案为D。其实这题逻辑过程有些类似OG 上128题，因为给他去信的大部分是支持他的，所以不能有样本的代表性。故消弱。

bettyofarim · 发表于 2003-12-10 18:35:00

thank you

请教两提答案的正确与否？

请教两提答案的正确与否？

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()