只会用大白话写作文怎么办

拼写不要出错

大白话也分高级和低级

比如你的逻辑是否严密等

Recently the discussion of whether job security and salary
should be based on employee performance or years of service attracts public
attention. As per my opinion, I would like agree with the author that employee
performance should be considered for job security and salary, but only if the
candidates have the similar working experience, skill and knowledge. However,
the author extends the argument to an unnecessary extreme, while overlooking
some other aspects and special cases. My agreement and contention of this issue
will be discussed respectively.

On the one hand, employee performance should be the most
important factor to consider for job security and salary. People are paid
because they perform. It is obviously not reasonable to give somebody a raise
just because he served the company longer than others. Eventually, for any
company, the goal is to make profit by all employees’ outstanding performance,
so policy and regulation within the company should be in line with this goal.
What's more, giving job security and salary according to performance can deliver
staff a positive message and help to establish a health motivation in the
organization. Obviously, all those positive message and motivation help the
company to maintain a competitive market position through good performance from
all staff.

A study conducted by Hewitt consulting firm happened to
prove this as well. The studies focused on the top motivations for employee’s
loyalty. The result of this study reveals that a fair payment based on employee
performance is the top reason employee has loyalty to the company. Although it
is not a direct evidence to prove pay and job security should base on
performance rather than years of service, but it does provide some background
context helping to make an objective judgment.

On the other hand, the author may overlook some other
particular situations of this issue to make it not as reasonable and convincing
as it stands. A company meet some employee turn over problem and hiring trouble
may want to give years of services a bigger consideration in order to keep some
senior people. It is also possible that in some special industry, training
effort is extremely high so that management really would like to give long
service employee a sort of motivation. So in the cases like those, simply judge
that management should always provide job security and salary raise base on
performance is not a thoughtful claim.

Which one is more important to be considered on for job
security and salary, that is a complex question, hence it is hard to give a
simple and objective answer. According to me, management should consider more
about employee performance if candidates have the similar years of service.
Obviously we also need admit in some special cases, years of service could be a
more important factor to be considered to ensure company's overall efficiency
and productivity.

好久没来了

AWA的话，有一点我觉得比较重要，GMAT是能力测试，不是英语语言测试（要不然托福就白考拉！）

大白话没什么不好的，我最后拿了6分，但写的就是大白话，最复杂的也就是定语从句，其他的大词汇没有（因为不会写啊），但是逻辑思维要注重, 写的文章，要把事情、idea和举证都说清楚，这样就不会差了

给我的感觉就是，GMAT的精神，逻辑第一位的，任何东西都要有条理，另外花哨的东西真的不那么重要~

LZ加油！！！