lsat-24-1-10对一道题目的答案存疑

24--1--10 我的是PDF版本，没法贴上来，大家帮个忙

答案是C，我倾向于E

Premiums for automobile accident insurance are often higher for red cars than for cars of other colors. To justify these higher charges, insurance companies claim that, overall, a greater percentage of red cars are involved in accidents than are cars of any other color. If this claim is true, then lives could undoubtedly be saved by banning red cars from the roads altogether.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
(A) accepts without question that insurance companies have the right to charge higher premiums for higher-risk clients
(B) fails to consider whether red cars cost the same to repair as cars of other colors
(C) ignores the possibility that drivers who drive recklessly have a preference for red cars
(D) does not specify precisely what percentage of red cars are involved in accidents
(E) makes an unsupported assumption that every automobile accident results in some loss of life

是此题吗？

If this is the one, the answer is C, which simply points out that it is the reckless driver, not the color of red, that causes the higher rate of accident.

The argument in the question does not make the assumption in E. Itis common sense that lives are lost in accidents. Therefore if number of accidents is reduced, lives will be saved. It is not necessarily the case that every accident involves loss of life to save life when accidents are reduced.

呵呵，明白了，想复杂了