- UID
- 534388
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-5-18
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
100. (30745-!-item-!-188;#058&005748) (T-9-Q28. ???-7-13 ,different type) Lymedisease is caused by a bacterium transmitted to humans by deer ticks. Generally, deer ticks pick up the bacteriumwhile in the larval stage by feeding on infected white-footed mice. However, certain other species on which thelarvae feed do not harbor the bacterium. If the population of these other species were increased, more of the larvaewould be feeding on uninfected hosts, so the number of ticks acquiring thebacterium would likely decline. Whichof the following would it be most important to ascertain in evaluating theargument? A.Whether populations of the other species on which deer tick larvae feed arefound only in areas also inhabited by white-footed mice B.Whether the size of the deer tick population is currently limited by theavailability of animals for the tick's larval stage to feed on C.Whether the infected deer tick population could be controlled by increasing thenumber of animals that prey on white-footed mice D.Whether deer ticks that were not infected as larvae can become infected asadults by feeding on deer on which infected deer ticks have fed E.Whether the other species on which deer tick larvae feed harbor any otherbacteria that ticks transmit to humans
OA B 我个人比较同意的一个对B的解释 (B) Whether the size of the deer tick population is currently limited by the availability of animals for the tick's larval stage to feed on.
If the answer is yes, the size of the deer tick population is currently limited by the availability of food sources, then the conclusion is weakened - an increase in food sources would likely just lead to an increase in deer ticks, not a spreading out of deer ticks to these other animals.
If the answer is no, the size of the tick population isn't currently limited by the availablity of food sources, then the conclusion is strengthened - the same number of ticks spread out over more animals, a higher proportion of which are uninfected, means that fewer deer ticks will be exposed to the bacterium.
Note that neither answer proves or disproves the conclusion (e.g. we don't know for sure if deer ticks will spread out to other animals), but that's not our task - we just want the choice that's most relevant. 但是我还是无法排除D,很多讨论排除掉D理由都是irrelevance。例如下面两种解释 D.) There's no mention of deer in the paragraph, just deer ticks. Looks like another trap. Would be more enticing if it mentioned general other species instead of deer specifically.
(D) Whether deer ticks that were not infected as larvae can become infected as adults by feeding on deer on which infected deer ticks have fed.
Wuzzat? This might be relevant to the general issue about how ticks get infected, but we know nothing at all about the life cycle of the tick - as soon as we see "become infected as adults" we should eliminate this as outside the scope (especially because it has nothing to do with the food sources of larvae). 但是如果adults可以被感染的话,同样可以削弱文中的措施;只是如果不可以的话似乎不能加强结论。 如果一道题考虑这么多哪里做的完? 但是用相关性排除的话,偶第一个就把B排掉了想问一下大家有什么好方法么? |
|