T-4-Q38 (XY12) - help 看不懂答案

T-4-Q38

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

1. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

2. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.

3. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

4. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.

5. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

很不好意思地说:  题的意思和答案都没看懂呢,   来求助.....  

答案应该是C吧

在一个州里，所有的城市和乡镇都有禁烟法令。有一个名为“全州禁烟”的请愿活动。推行这个请愿活动的人现在正向投票人大力推介这个请愿活动，但他们只问投票人“你是否想签名以支持一个推行全州禁烟的请愿活动？”这个请愿活动提倡通过一个州级的法令，禁止在大多数零售商场及对公众开放的政府办事处吸烟。问：以下哪种情况会对（认为这个请愿活动是要把地方禁烟法令延伸到全州）的投票人产生误导？

C说的是，（根据这个请愿而通过的）州级法令会凌驾于地方的禁烟法令以上，即，有了这个州法令后，地方上的禁烟法令反而不生效了，而地方上的禁烟法令实际上比这个州法令更严格。那么就是说，通过这个请愿反而是放松了禁烟限制了，也并没有把地方上严格的禁烟法令延伸到全州，所以这是对那些（认为这个请愿活动是要把地方禁烟法令延伸到全州）的投票人进行了误导。