Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer’s legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.
In the consumer advocate’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
(C) The first is pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
weiyu gg,我自己对og的理解和你得差不多，但是如果是这样理解，我觉得答案应是b,而不是c呀？我觉得题目是一个问题的两个方面，正面结果和负面的可能结果。og的意思可能是一个负面结果，前面的 正面意思只是打幌子，你觉得怎样呢？
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-4-1 00:09:00
楼主
