ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been replacing electrical wire for transmitting telecommunications signals. Signals running through fiber-optic cables deteriorate, and so the signals must be run through a piece of equipment called a regenerator before being transmitted farther. Light-Line is the leading manufacturer of signal regenerators. Therefore, Light-Line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the prediction about Light-Line's prospects?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8839|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD31-16 ~~一道没想明白的题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-23 17:28:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD31-16

16: In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been replacing electrical wire for transmitting telecommunications signals. Signals running through fiber-optic cables deteriorate, and so the signals must be run through a piece of equipment called a regenerator before being transmitted father. Light-Line is the leading manufacturer of signal regenerators. Therefore, Light-line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.



Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the prediction about light-ling’s prospects?



A: Telecommunications signals sent along electrical wires can travel much farther than signals transmitted through fiber-optic before needing to be regenerated.



B: Expanding its production of regenerators will require Light-line to spend proportionately more on labor and materials.



C: The volume of signals that a fiber-optic cable can carry is several thousand times greater than the volume that can be carried by an electrical wire of similar size.



D: There are technologies that enable telecommunications signals to be transmitted without either wire or fiber-optic cable.



E: Several manufacturers are developing regenerator technologies that will allow signals to be transmitted many times farther than at present before requiring regeneration.

答案选E.

看了很多网友评论说E表明新技术出现后,就不在需要regenerator. 请大家再仔细看下E,说的是Several manufacturers are developing regenerator technologies that 。。。。 before requiring regeneration. 就说明还是需要regenerator了。

我选的是D,因为新技术出现后,可能就不需要regenerator了。有网友评论说,这个答案在质疑原文中的事实。可是题目说的就是“Which of the following, if true,。。。 ”,"if true" 就说明应该可以质疑原文中提到的观点。还请NN解答
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-23 17:37:27 | 只看该作者
关键原文明确说明了 if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks ,要建的是一个光纤骨干网。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-23 17:46:54 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上的回复。可以进一步解释为什么E对吗?如果仍旧需要regenerator的话。
地板
发表于 2011-5-8 19:40:35 | 只看该作者
文章的意思是因为需要regenerator所以light-line会更受益,然而E选项说signal可以传得更远,也就是说使得L受益的R数量减少了,也就是抵消了文中的使L受益的原因。
5#
发表于 2011-5-8 21:05:29 | 只看该作者

try

D选项--无关选项,技术的提高带来的不使用光纤和普通电缆。但是体面问题假设是如果扩大光纤的使用。所以就不用考虑如上的问题了。所以是无关的。E选项,削弱。大批量的光线工程一定能带来光纤的使用量。按照原来的技术,对generator需求会增加,从而对企业有利。 但是这里一些企业能是单位距离的光纤对generator的需求减少。从而,虽然光纤使用增加,并不一定带来对generator的需求增加。所以削弱。为正解。
6#
发表于 2011-5-24 10:52:52 | 只看该作者
突然有想法,不知道对不对~

前提:信号会在传输过程中被减弱,所以如果传输距离很远的话,需要regenerator来不断重建信号。
结论:作为生产regenerator行业的龙头老大,如果大面积建造这种远距离光纤的话,LL公司会获益很大。

D只是说有一种新技术可以让信号传输without either wire or fiber-optic cable,但是难道这样就不会造成信号削弱的问题吗?我们整个题讨论的背景都是在为了解决信号减弱问题,如果你这项新技术仍然会带来信号削弱问题,那还是要regenerator,还是会导致LL获益,所以D并不确定能不能削弱结论。

看E,allow signals to be transmitted many times ,many times很重要,如果新技术可以让信号自己就完成多次发送,那当然就不需要regenerator,因而也就不会给LL带来收益,削弱!

欢迎讨论哈~~
7#
发表于 2011-5-24 11:16:20 | 只看该作者
E allow signals to be transmitted many times farther than at present before requiring regeneration.

感觉这句话的意思是说信号传输的更远,以至于不需要regeneration了,所以对LL公司不利,不知道这样理解对不对。。。。。
8#
发表于 2011-5-24 11:23:44 | 只看该作者
transmitted many times

transmitted many times farther

These are two difference things!
9#
发表于 2011-5-24 12:33:57 | 只看该作者
transmitted many times

transmitted many times farther

These are two difference things!
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/5/24 11:23:44)


Yes! I think I'm wrong. many times is just a phrase used to modify farther. But the meaning  I want to express is still the same. If the new technology could prevent signals from deteriorating without the regenerator, the LL company would not benefit from the program. Right?
10#
发表于 2014-7-1 11:44:49 | 只看该作者
坤kun 发表于 2011-5-24 12:33
transmitted many timestransmitted many times fartherThese are two difference things!-- by 会员 sd ...

But the new technology is a kind of  regenerator technology, so they still have to use regenerator, right? So that u said "prevent signals from deteriorating without the regenerator" is wrong. We can't do this without regenerator  and what the argument mentioned is a new regenerator technology. How to explain this?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 15:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部