ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 942|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[请教]大全section D-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-21 03:35:00 | 只看该作者

[请教]大全section D-15

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not properly value the preservation of human life. Although animal suffering is unfortunate, it is justifiable if it can lead to cures for human ailments.

Melvin: But much animal experimentation involves testing of ordinary consumer products such as soaps, dyes, and cosmetics.

Susan: These experiments are justifiable on the same grounds, since cleanliness, convenience, and beauty are worthwhile human values deserving of support.

Which of the following is the best statement of the logical flaw in Susan’s argument?

(A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.

(B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.

(C) She uses the word “value” in two different senses.

(D) She assumes that all ordinary consumer products aid in the preservation of human life.

(E) She fails to show how mere support for human values actually preserves human lives.

答案:E

我选了D。S首先讲拿动物作试验是为了给人治病,后又讲为了human values也可以用动物作试验,那不就是错误地把human lifes 和 human values等同了吗?D为什么不对?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-22 05:31:00 | 只看该作者
help!help!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 15:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部