ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1253|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问陈向东书里的一道题,请大家帮忙。。。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-21 08:20:00 | 只看该作者

问陈向东书里的一道题,请大家帮忙。。。

Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into privete hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charges of operating and financing the national park systems, which is now run by the government.

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.

B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.

答案是A,可是我觉得B选项怎么不对了?求助。。。

沙发
发表于 2007-8-21 09:49:00 | 只看该作者

题目要求most strongly against

A的结果比B更坏:those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources一旦取得领导权,就可能abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources.

而B的结果最多不过是not always agree on the best ways to achieve the goal (conservation objectives).

你再想一想。

我终于遇到了一个跟我复习同一种资料的人了。以后多交流吧。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-21 11:54:00 | 只看该作者

watermoon07,

你好~是不是B选项中说private environmental groups用的不是best way,但并没有反驳to achieve the goal,所以并不是“most strongly against”,这么理解对吗?

地板
发表于 2007-8-21 12:54:00 | 只看该作者
对,我是这么理解的。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-21 13:39:00 | 只看该作者
thanks a million!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 18:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部