ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1464|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]看了讨论,还是不明白大全section I-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-22 05:25:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]看了讨论,还是不明白大全section I-20

大全-I-20

A light bulb company produces 2,000 light bulbs per week. The manager wants to ensure that standards of quality remain constant from week to week. The manager, therefore, claims that out of 2,000 light bulbs produced per week, 500 light bulbs are rejected.

Of the following, the best criticism of the manager’s plan is that the plan assumes that

(A) light bulb manufacturers cannot accept all light bulbs that produced

(B) the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced

(C) each light bulb that is reviewed is worthy of being reviewed

(D) it is difficult to judge the quality of a light bulbE

(E) the 1,500 light bulbs that are accepted will be of the same quality from week to week
        

我就是不明白,manager从2000个灯泡中拒掉500个和保证质量有什么关系?出多少废品就拒绝多少,这不就好了吗,为什么非要规定500个?那如果出了600个废品,他就把剩下的100个当成是好的接受吗?这样的话,1500个里面还是有100个是劣质的,由怎么能保证质量的standard呢?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-26 01:50:00 | 只看该作者
upupup!
板凳
发表于 2007-8-26 10:50:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用citizen100在2007-8-22 5:25:00的发言:
大全-I-20

A light bulb company produces 2,000 light bulbs per week. The manager wants to ensure that standards of quality remain constant from week to week. The manager, therefore, claims that out of 2,000 light bulbs produced per week, 500 light bulbs are rejected.

Of the following, the best criticism of the manager’s plan is that the plan assumes that

(A) light bulb manufacturers cannot accept all light bulbs that produced

(B) the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced

(C) each light bulb that is reviewed is worthy of being reviewed

(D) it is difficult to judge the quality of a light bulbE

(E) the 1,500 light bulbs that are accepted will be of the same quality from week to week
  

我就是不明白,manager从2000个灯泡中拒掉500个和保证质量有什么关系?出多少废品就拒绝多少,这不就好了吗,为什么非要规定500个?那如果出了600个废品,他就把剩下的100个当成是好的接受吗?这样的话,1500个里面还是有100个是劣质的,由怎么能保证质量的standard呢?

楼主还是没看清楚题目,这个题目其实是假定题,题目本来就说manager的方法有问题啊,它就是让你指出manager做这个plan的一个错误assumption啊。manager认为每个月reject 500只就是可以ensure that standards of quality remain constant from week to week,所以他肯定是做了E这样一个不合理的假设

所以选E

至于E为什么是不合理假设,楼主自己已经解释得很清楚了,我就不再罗嗦了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-20 09:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部