ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4713|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教prep-2-17

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-5-8 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

请教prep-2-17


    

At
present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.  However, many customers come to watch the
celebrities who frequent the Hollywood,
and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford
a better view of the celebrities. 
Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as
diners seated at standard-height tables. 
Therefore, if the Hollywood
replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would
increase.


    

 


    

The
argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to
believe that it is likely that


    

 


    

(A) some
celebrities come to the Hollywood
to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were
available


    

(B) the
price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if
any, they spend lingering over their meals


    

(C) a
customer of the Hollywood
who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the
generalization about lingering


    

(D) a
restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less
expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer


    

(E) with
enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's
customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other
tall tables



答案是C,不理解;另外D为何不对呢
沙发
发表于 2007-5-8 15:31:00 | 只看该作者
D没有提到高脚凳的好处啊,怎么会与答案相关?
板凳
发表于 2007-5-8 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

答案C是说来Hollywood并选择高桌子的客户并不一定比选择标准桌子的客户消耗的时间短,所以削弱了作者的说法。

答案D说了“a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals ”,但这个customer并不等于选择高桌子的customer,所以是错的

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-5-8 16:43:00 | 只看该作者
thanks a lot

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-5-13 14:27:00 | 只看该作者
我对这题的理解:
题干:目前
Hollywood
Restaurant只有标准高度的桌子。许多顾客来这是为了看光顾这的名人的,而这些顾客偏好高脚的桌子,因为看得更清楚一些。moreover,吃饭
的人通常在高脚的座位上待的时间比标准作为的时间短些。因此作者得出如果这家饭店把部分标准座位换为高脚座位的话,利润会增加。问weaken?

这个推理的flaw在于认为在
Hollywood Restaurant的坐高脚座位的人会像一般情况下一样也待的时间短些,而这个个别例子不一定适用于一般情况。C指出了这个问题

(C) a
customer of the Hollywood
who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the
generalization about lingering

关键是对这句话的理解:an exception to the generalization about lingering是指来这的顾客坐高脚坐位的与一般情况不同(exception to the generalization),还是会逗留很久。


    (D) a
restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less
expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
D是讲一般情况,没有注意到例子的特殊性。

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-13 15:47:19编辑过]
6#
发表于 2007-5-13 15:18:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢lz的解释,但是对"an exception to the generalization about lingering是指来这的顾客极少(exception)选择高脚座位,大部分人(generalization)还是会逗留很久。"我还不是很理解. 我觉得flaw是片面认为选择了高脚桌的人是不会象一般情况一样逗留时间长的特例.

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-5-13 15:48:00 | 只看该作者
sorry,刚才没仔细看,写错了。我已经更正了
8#
发表于 2008-1-22 12:02:00 | 只看该作者

两类顾客:选择高桌子观看名人的顾客,通常的用餐顾客.观看名人的逗留时间短。->换高桌子能增加利润。问削弱?

C:选择高桌子(观看名人)的顾客只是例外相对于通常的顾客在逗留时间上。->换了高桌子以后,那些通常用餐的顾客座了高桌子和以前的逗留时间还会是一样的。所以不能得出换了高桌子就能增加利润。

9#
发表于 2008-5-4 10:44:00 | 只看该作者
10#
发表于 2008-11-1 08:35:00 | 只看该作者

虽然过时了,但还是留下我的理解。这也应该是道取非题。客人停留的时间短,意味着“翻桌”的次数多,利润就高。如果选择高桌的人多,停留的时间长,利润就低。所以说选择高桌的人停留的时间不比坐普通桌子的人长,利润就有保障。

我这道题也做错了,遇到取非的时候,真的很难呀,脑子要在那么短的时间转过来,怎一个哭字了得

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-29 20:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部