ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 682|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Prep上一题求教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-25 14:48:00 | 只看该作者

Prep上一题求教

The cost of square slab is proportional to its thichness and also preportional to the square of its length. What is the cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meter thick?

(1)The cost of a square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.2 meter thick is $160 more than the cost of a square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick

(2)The cost of a square slab that is 3 meters long and 0.1 meter thick is $200 more than the cost of a square slab that is 2 meters long and 0.1 meter thick

答案给的是D.

我选的是C。

分别设定宽和长的比例系数为K和S, 则根据条件1 得 2*k+0.2*s-160=2*k+0.1*s ,得到s=1600

根据条件2得到 3*k+0.1*s-200=2*k+0.1*s ,得到k=2000

两个条件同时才能得到答案啊。

不知道我的思路哪里错了。请教

沙发
发表于 2007-6-25 19:41:00 | 只看该作者

comprehension mistake,actually we can solve this problem in common sense,the cost of square slab=thickness*length^2*p(unit cost per volume)

(1)2^2*0.2*p=160+2^2*0.1*p =>p=400 then 3^2*0.1*400=360
(2)the same as is canculated above

so either of (1) or (2) can solve this problem, the answer is D

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-25 21:49:00 | 只看该作者

恍然,原来是没弄清那个square。

谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 02:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部