[求助]这道逻辑就一直没有想明白,大家看看并指教~

如果随波逐流 · 发表于 2007-5-8 10:33:00

Fill

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the county’s “Report on Tourism” must be in error in indicating that _______.

more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield
there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed in the Royal Arms Hotel
some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal Arms Hotel has

Answer: B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

这是我搜到的解释----BCorrect. If the Report on Tourism indicate B, it must be fault because: tourists in hotels: S>H, hotel tourist: H> R.R, therefore, if the R.R is the only hotel in S, it is impossible to say that S have more tourists than H.

可我觉得答案的解释根本说不通啊

并且,我的推理是the largest hotel in Harristown is the only hotel in Harristown,和答案B的结论相反

我的推理如下: (大家看看有什么问题呢)

正是因为the largest hotel in Harristown is the only hotel in Harristown,就很可能满足事实(1)more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield.虽然说单家比the Royal Arms Hotel 的旅客数多,但由于 Harristown只有一家旅馆,所以满足条件(2)more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown.总的来说,还是springfield这个城市的旅馆旅客数多

怎么我的推理得出的答案和给的答案B是相反的啊...?

gonghao · 发表于 2007-5-8 13:08:00

情况1：在SP这个地方旅游的人比在H旅游的人多

情况2：住在H最大酒店的人比住在SP某一个酒店的人要多

问哪个不可能

SP某酒店的人少，但是SP这个地方的人旅游人多，如果SP的这家酒店是唯一的酒店，那么sp这个地方旅游的人人怎么可能多于H地方呢？

举个例子，在北京的旅游的人比在上海旅游的人多

而上海最大的X饭店住的人比之北京的Y饭店要多，

如果北京的Y饭店是北京唯一的饭店，那怎么可能呢？因为这样的话，北京唯一的饭店住的人比上海最大的饭店人少的话，北京旅游的人都睡马路？

yaoshuming · 发表于 2007-5-8 13:49:00

以下是引用如果随波逐流在2007-5-8 10:33:00的发言：

Fill

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the county’s “Report on Tourism” must be in error in (this is the key word)indicating that _______.

more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield
there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed in the Royal Arms Hotel
some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal Arms Hotel has

Answer: B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

这是我搜到的解释----BCorrect. If the Report on Tourism indicate B, it must be fault because: tourists in hotels: S>H, hotel tourist: H> R.R, therefore, if the R.R is the only hotel in S, it is impossible to say that S have more tourists than H.

可我觉得答案的解释根本说不通啊

并且,我的推理是the largest hotel in Harristown is the only hotel in Harristown,和答案B的结论相反

我的推理如下: (大家看看有什么问题呢)

正是因为the largest hotel in Harristown is the only hotel in Harristown,就很可能满足事实(1)more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield.虽然说单家比the Royal Arms Hotel 的旅客数多,但由于 Harristown只有一家旅馆,所以满足条件(2)more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown.总的来说,还是springfield这个城市的旅馆旅客数多

怎么我的推理得出的答案和给的答案B是相反的啊...?

please look at the red words,the logic line what u say is right, and the answer is which of the following must be wrong. choice B

sciveya · 发表于 2007-5-8 14:55:00

同意楼上的

楼主大概是题目没看清

如果随波逐流 · 发表于 2007-5-8 15:08:00

哦大概明白了~~

似乎是没有认真读题

本贴相关题目 TN-04-CR-28 (STJJ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

[求助]这道逻辑就一直没有想明白,大家看看并指教~

[求助]这道逻辑就一直没有想明白,大家看看并指教~

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()