ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2445|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] LSAT-7-4-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-15 12:41:00 | 只看该作者

[求助] LSAT-7-4-23

23.   The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell’s president is well aware, however, in order to increase the worker’s wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell’s subsidiaries will be sold.

The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses.

(B) Bell’s management will refuse to increase its worker’s wages.

(C) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike.

(D) Bell’s president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase.C

(E) Bell’s workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase.

我不太懂為什麼這一題的答案是c,e的a package of improved benefits 指的是subsidiaries嗎?如果是的話,那e不是更適合做答案嗎?謝謝


沙发
发表于 2004-3-15 22:12:00 | 只看该作者
C为正确答案无疑.:NOT STRIKE---INCREASE WAGES---SUBSIDIARIES


选E为典型的加入自己的信息

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-16 11:33:00 | 只看该作者
不好意思,我還是不太懂為什麼c是正確答案耶

地板
发表于 2008-7-30 08:31:00 | 只看该作者
NOT STRIKE---INCREASE WAGES---SUBSIDIARIES SOLD
说明 NOT STRIKE 是 SUBSIDIARIES SOLD 的充分条件, 而 SUBSIDIARIES SOLD 才是 NOT STRIKE 必要条件。
做假设题,我们要找出结论成立的必要条件,那个必要条件就是题中的假设。但是这里的 C 选项是结论的充分条件,难道充分条件也可以是题中的假设吗?

还有一个判断假设的方法:如果假设不成立,题中的推理一定不成立。
如果  STRIKE ,那么一定能够推出 SUBSIDIARIES will not be SOLD? 不能够! 这就是从另一方面看出,NOT STRIKE只能是SUBSIDIARIES SOLD的充分条件。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-17 19:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部