ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2397|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-3-2逻辑 在线等

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-11 15:59:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-3-2逻辑 在线等


        

GWD-3-2:
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts
in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If
the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world
market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However,
since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff
would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban
unemployment over the next five years.

        


        


                

 


        


        

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

        


        


                

 


        


        

A.Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.


        

 


        

B.Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.


        

C.More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.


        

 


        

D.Buying
unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.


        

 


        

E.A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.


        

 


        

请大家帮我讨论一下这道题,谢谢了!OA is E  有点不明白E为什么能削弱 ??


    
沙发
发表于 2009-10-11 18:00:00 | 只看该作者

先看E的逻辑链:

High Tariff--->价格无竟争----》农民无利可图---》农民进城----》就业问题加重。

由此可以推出:

Removing Tariff--->价格有竟争----》农民有利可图----》农民不会进城----》就业问题减轻。

也就是说根据E可以推断出:Removing Tariff得到的结果是就业问题减轻,而不是材料中说的Hamper the effort to reduce 就业问题.

因此,E正确。

板凳
发表于 2009-10-11 19:10:00 | 只看该作者

Well explained! 楼上厉害!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-12 14:39:00 | 只看该作者
E 那里说很多农人进到城里找工作。那么如果废除腰豆出口税,腰豆就有更多销路,所
以就不用跑进城里。那么城里的失业率也就不会因为腰豆加工厂生意少了而增加。
5#
发表于 2009-10-12 22:56:00 | 只看该作者
nice explanation...



您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 13:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部