Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing cancer, researchers believe that infection by the SV40 virus is a contributing cause,[b1] since in the United States 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from healthy tissue, contain SV40.[b2] SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus[b3] . Researchers hypothesize that this vaccine was the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.[b4]
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the researchers’ hypothesis?
Answer: E
[b1]Conclusion-1
[b2]Evindence-1, which is support of the above conclusion.
[b3]Evidence-2 support to below hypothesize
[b4]Hypothesize
My question is why C is wrong. What is the right way to solve the "support" problem?
However, I think that to find the answer to the "support" question, we should find the choice which will support the evidence or assumption, right?
So I consider Choice C support of the evidence that in 1960 some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus.
举报
I make the same mistake with u .
who would help us? thanks
I also picked C. Any NN can help to answer this question?
GWD-10-9(xy13)
自己的一点想法:
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=236699&page=1
各位前辈的老贴:但是对于无因无果的判断在这题里面的使用表示质疑(虽然PP答案和网上文章说明答案是E)但是对于本题的来说E有不严密之处。
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=78495
发表回复
手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 01:37 京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
ChaseDream 论坛
© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.