ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2075|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-29 18:49:00 | 只看该作者

求教!!

21. Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton’s psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven’s hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven’s time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian’s argument depends?
(A) None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
(B) Some people in Beethoven’s time did not ingest mercury.
(C) Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
(D) Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
(E) Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton’s.

答案是B,我不知道为什么是假设?


沙发
发表于 2003-10-29 19:26:00 | 只看该作者
用取非的方法就解决了。E不对,因为取非后不影响文章。D取非后是水银不会造成耳聋,这也不影响文章的结论。C取非后是水银不是治疗肾病的好方法。这几乎是事实了,也不影响文章的成立。B取非的结果是所有人在老贝的时代都摄入水银,那么水银就不能作为判断的依据了,难不成所有人都有肾病?这就影响文章的结论的成立了。A取非的结果是一些水银进入身体后还会被排除的。这不影响以水银作为判断的依据,因为排除的很少可能不影响做出判断所需要的含量
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-30 09:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部