ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature's move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat's response to Mel is inadequate in that it

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3354|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GMAT-25-3请教求解思路

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-11 14:33:00 | 只看该作者

GMAT-25-3请教求解思路



























Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best
Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has
done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with
a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat:  No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few
judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative
effect.
Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it












attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.





mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change





attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
by pointing to the absence of negative effects





simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial





assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group.
沙发
发表于 2005-11-11 15:54:00 | 只看该作者

C

板凳
发表于 2005-11-11 16:52:00 | 只看该作者

B


因果倒置。


Mel: ban-> decline of teaching


Pat: no teaching-> the ban has no effect.


大家讨论。


地板
发表于 2005-11-12 12:40:00 | 只看该作者

题目本来的答案是什么?

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-13 08:39:00 | 只看该作者
给出的答案是:A。我现在拿不准是A还是C.
6#
发表于 2005-11-13 12:47:00 | 只看该作者

偶也分不清是A还是C

7#
发表于 2005-11-14 13:59:00 | 只看该作者
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best


Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has


done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with


a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.


Pat:  No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few


judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative


effect.


仔细看时态,A有道理。但我认为C也有道理。
8#
发表于 2005-12-17 14:55:00 | 只看该作者

哦第一眼选 a 看到 c也不好。


文中由禁止moonlighting 推出法案是没有改善效果的


c中说出moonlighting 没影响到几个人推出法案是有效的


既然前面有一个前提能推出结论,那马后面推翻前提, 也就可以推翻结论。


应该选a   现在搞外快的人是少,但是可能以后大家嫌工资太少说不定还想搞呢。所以很有可能有了这个ban 后,收入没有改观。


9#
发表于 2006-6-3 09:20:00 | 只看该作者
应该是C啊:
attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects

certain change就是指raise the salary
possitive effect就是指does improve the situation
absence of negative effects就是指since few judgs teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect

多完美的对应啊!


10#
发表于 2007-1-10 20:48:00 | 只看该作者

C说得很清楚啊!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-10 20:52:04编辑过]
返回列表 发新帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: GMAT考试

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-5 14:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部