绝望中的挣扎！

一战惨不忍睹，610估计没几个人会象我考怎么惨的了还上过XDF,我真有点想撞墙的感觉。逻辑部分是我的瓶颈尽管看了很多牛人心经，做了OG,GWD和FF我还是感到我逻辑部分理解题意方面很差虽然从句子语法结构上看的懂，这极大地影响了判断选项这是不是缺乏常识地缘故。下个月还想二战但是却不知要如何针对性地提高，下面两题是我刚看到的两题，题目意思好像似懂非懂，请NN们帮我分析下思路，顺便能解释下题意最好了，我真的真的感激不过了！

1．On the basis of figures it complies, a citizens’ group argues that congressional members of party X authorize the spending of more taxpayer dollars than do congressional members of Party Y. The group’s figures are based on an analysis of the number of spending bills for which members of Congress vote.

The figures of the citizens’ group will be unreliable as a gauge of which party in Congress spends more taxpayer dollars if which of the following is true? 

A) the group weighs all votes for spending bills equally, no matter how much taxpayer money is involved in each bill.

B) The group counts votes for all spending bills, including bills concerning the salaries of members of congress.

C) Most spending bills that members of Party X vote for are passed by Congress.

D) Most spending bills that members of Party X vote for are written and sponsored by members of Party X.

E) All spending bills, before being voted on by Congress, must be approved by committees in which members of both parties participate.

2．How does a building contractor most readily prove compliance with the building codes governing new construction? By using those established technologies that the authors of the codes had in mind when setting specifications. This, unfortunately, means that there will never be any significant technological innovation within the industry.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the conclusion above?

A) Among the authors of codes governing new construction are people who were formerly building contractors.

B) The authors of codes governing new construction are under pressure to set rigorous specifications.

C) What are now regarded as established technologies were once so innovative that the authors of the codes then applicable could not have foreseen them.

D) Noncompliance with the codes governing new construction can prove extremely costly to the building contractor in charge of the project.

E) The established technologies of one country’s building industry can be very different from those of another’s.

第一题说白了就是一个单价和数量的关系。

题目说一个组织衡量哪个党派的支出多，他们衡量的标准是哪个党派的支出法案的数量多，但A说这种衡量只考虑的法案的数量但不考虑每一个法案包含的金钱数量。

这道题就好比说看两家商店谁的收入高。结果A比B买的东西数量多并不说明A的收入高，因为我们还要考虑商品的价格。

第二题说现在的方法都是受到限制的，author of codes理解成立法者就行了。因此既然必须服从现在的规定，就要使用现有的科技。因此该行业就不会有创新。

这是一个偷换概念。其实句子里面有三层关系，作者直接把服从规定等同于不能创新。C就说现在符合规定的技术，以前根本就超乎于立法者想象之外了。

谢谢楼上NN的现身，受益～

第二题追问一下，“其实句子里面有三层关系”是哪三层关系呢？

第一层:compliance with code=using established knowledge once in the mind of the author of code

第二层:using established knowledge once in the mind of the author of code=hamper technology innovation

第三层（选项C):现在所谓的 established knowledge在author of code编写code的时候，可能是非常创新的理念，以至于那时的编者在当时也没有预见到。

根据第三层作一步推理：现在的编者在编写code的时候，也会用到一些knowledge，而这些knowledge可能会包含非常innovative technology,但编者自己却没有预见到。所以遵循这些code并不会影响到技术创新，因为东西本来就是创新的，只不过现在还没有预见到罢了。

其实就是把第二层的假设给否掉了。

MM不要泄气，一次没考好没关系，多多总结，下次一定会有进步的，精诚所至，金石为开，不要放弃！