ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 618|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

做题遇到JJ可以秒杀么?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-16 23:21:00 | 只看该作者

做题遇到JJ可以秒杀么?

1999年时,有一个记者采访了GMAT的出题机构GMAC的首席执行官戴维斯先生,问他题是怎么做出来的。他说,为什么大家相信有些培训机构说如果做不完就填上就完了呢,这是不对的。GMAT是匹配性判分,不在乎做得快慢,有人说是不是要求在15秒钟内点完答案?不是的,如果你平均能在15秒钟内点完答案也可以,如果你前面做题快,后面没个题是用半分钟做,即使作对也不给分,还有可能扣分。有人不了解这种情况,胡点答案,导致反而被扣分,对整个成绩有很大负面影响。这是复习中机考和笔试的一个本质区别点。  from bettywushh

如果这样的话,我们的JJ还能派上多大的用场?如果我遇到一道数学或是任意一道语文JJ,一模一样我能秒杀么?总不能等一到两分钟再点吧?sigh,这分数是咋给的阿?

沙发
发表于 2006-10-17 06:20:00 | 只看该作者
不会吧,这样的话,不是更难控制PACE
板凳
发表于 2006-10-17 07:15:00 | 只看该作者
What they are doing is not right. What if one question costs me 2 whole minutes to make a choice, then the next question, a simple "rather than", "instead of" question only costs me a mere 10 seconds to make a right choice?
地板
发表于 2006-10-17 09:44:00 | 只看该作者

10秒再杀

5#
发表于 2006-10-17 10:46:00 | 只看该作者

http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/originals/bs80424.htm

BW: It has been suggested that the CAT's scoring methodology completely changes the manner in which a test taker should prepare for the test. That if you do well on the first 10-20 questions -- which determine the level of difficulty and point allotment per question -- that you're home free.
 

Wilson: That's dead wrong. I've heard that same claim being made by both Kaplan and Princeton Review (two prominent GMAT preparatory services), and their material is simply wrong. The logic that an individual who answers the first 20 questions correctly doesn't have to worry about the rest of the questions in the test is absurd. For example, a particular test taker did well for most of the test, but then guessed on the last 10 questions because he figured he had it made. But that just wasn't the case: He went from a projected 640 to a 420.

We now have the capability to save each stroke you make on your CAT keyboard, as well as measure how much time elapsed between each of your answer selections. That allows us to go back and evaluate each individual test. I know, if you took an average of 107 seconds for the first 15 questions, and 3 seconds for the last 15, that you guessed for your last 15 questions. It's unfortunate that people follow the "first 10 strategy" because that just isn't the way the algorithm works.

BW: How does the algorithm work?
 

Wilson: The first questions do in fact signal whether you go on to more or less difficult questions. That's one of the functions of the adaptive test: It responds to your response. However, that function doesn't stop after a given amount of questions. It continually adapts questions and point allotments based on your response. The bad information being put out there is that once you get to a certain level, after a specific number of questions, that your score isn't going to fluctuate too much. That's just wrong. I'm sorry that's the advice that's being put out there. And we actually advised to the contrary in November of 1996, in a letter that we sent to all of the test prep organizations.

BW: Do you have plans to work with Kaplan or Princeton Review to correct the situation?
 

Actually, within the next week (4/27), we'll be sending out a letter to all schools and test prep organizations explaining what we feel is misinformation.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-17 10:47:04编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 07:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部